BodyCam Analytics exists for one reason: to cut the time your prosecutors, paralegals, and staff lose to searching and scrubbing bodycam by 90%. Spend your time managing your cases — not hunting through hours of video for the moments that matter.
A decade ago a case file was paper. Today a single incident can arrive with body-camera footage from four officers, dashcam, and interview-room video — hours of it, on every matter in the stack. Someone has to watch all of it.
In most offices that someone is an ADA or a paralegal, scrubbing through video at 2x between hearings. The review is what delays a charging decision, holds up a plea offer, and surfaces the discovery material late. The frame where a weapon comes into view, the moment a suspect makes an admission, the second a Miranda warning is given — those decide the case. Miss one, or find it too late, and the office loses ground it cannot get back.
It is not a question of effort. It is hours in the day that no prosecutor's office has to spare. BodyCam Analytics was built to fix that — not by skipping the review, but by indexing the footage so the review moves faster. A paralegal uploads the recording with a few plain-language questions; minutes later the prosecutor opens a searchable, flagged transcript and reviews the evidence with a map of everything in it.
I am a former prosecutor. For years I tried cases across the spectrum — rape, domestic violence, and murder, alongside financial fraud, computer crime, and public corruption — and I also build and deploy AI applications. BodyCam Analytics came out of both.
So I know the burden that hours of body-camera footage put on a prosecutor's office and its staff, because I carried it. I watched the review eat entire days — scrubbing footage frame by frame, between hearings, on every case in the stack. The moments that decide a case are in there. The evidence has to be reviewed — but finding it should not mean hunting through every minute by hand, blind, hoping you miss nothing. That part is not legal work. It is data entry with a docket waiting on it.
So I built the tool I wanted, and then I kept building. Now a recording goes in, and minutes later the prosecutor opens a transcript with every key moment flagged and the whole video searchable. You still watch the evidence — you reach it directly, you see it in context, and as you go you bookmark it, annotate it, and build the issue and witness lists. The footage becomes work product, organized for a charging decision, a plea evaluation, and trial. The tool does the indexing. The prosecutor does the law.
— D. Taylor, Esq.
BodyCam Analytics does one job well — it turns footage into a record you can act on. It is not a case-management system and it does not pretend to practice law.
Footage review should not be the bottleneck between an incident and a charging decision. The same review capacity for every case — not just the ones with time to spare.
An ADA's review hour should go to the evidence, not the scrub bar. BodyCam Analytics hands every reviewer an indexed, searchable record — so the same hours cover more cases and end in organized work product, not scattered notes.
The output is evidence organized for use — bookmarks, issue lists, witness lists — ready for a charging decision, a plea evaluation, or a moment shown to a jury.
BodyCam Analytics produces a record, not a theory of the case. The visual transcript uses court-appropriate language: it states what is on camera — a hand on a holster, a person on the ground, an object exchanged — without claiming to know why. The events of interest are flags, not conclusions. Every screen carries a plain reminder that the output is AI-generated and that any quote should be verified against the source footage before it is relied on. The charging decision, the strategy, the argument — those stay where they belong, with the prosecutor.
Book a live walkthrough with the founder and see how BodyCam Analytics turns an hour of bodycam into a record your office can search, filter, and act on — or watch the recorded overview first.